One of the most common misunderstandings I hear from clients and visitors to my Wednesday evening livestreams has to do with the role of the Appeals Council. As you may know, if the hearing judge (called the Administrative Law Judge or ALJ) denies your disability claim, the next level of appeal is called the Appeals Council.
Many people assume the Appeals Council is simply a next step in the process—a second chance to tell their story and hope for a different result.
That is understandable, but it is not quite right.
The Appeals Council does not act like a second ALJ. It does not rehear the case, and it does not decide disability from scratch. Its job is much narrower and more technical. In most cases, it is not looking for a better answer. It is looking for a legal mistake.
Understanding that difference can mean the difference between a strong appeal and one that is almost certain to fail.
What the ALJ Does
To understand the Appeals Council, it helps to first understand the role of the Administrative Law Judge.
At the hearing level, the ALJ is the main decision-maker. The ALJ represents the Commissioner of the Social Security Adminstration and serves as both the representative of SSA and the finder of facts in your case. This is where the case is developed, reviewed, and decided. The ALJ listens to testimony, reviews medical records, weighs medical opinions, and decides what the claimant can still do despite their impairments. Continue reading →
When disability claimants first learn that turning 55 can dramatically change the outcome of a disability claim, they often assume it’s some kind of loophole, a kind of “soft retirement benefit” quietly built into the system. But it’s not that simple. What happens at 55 is more subtle, more structural, and far more revealing about how disability evaluation actually works.
One often-overlooked rule in Social Security disability cases can mean the difference between approval and denial—or even add thousands of dollars in back pay to your client’s award. That rule? The “Borderline Age” regulation. You can read the actual regulation at
As all of you are undoubtedly aware, the federal government shut down on October 1, 2025 because Congress and the President could not come to an agreement regarding funding to keep the government open. The early indication is that this may last for some time. Understandably, this creates concern for our clients. Below is the best information available right now about how this might affect clients who are in the process of applying for benefits.
As a Social Security disability attorney, Lyme disease cases represent a complex, frustrating, and often misunderstood type of disabling chronic illness. While the acute phase of Lyme disease is widely recognized and typically responsive to antibiotics, a subset of individuals develop long-lasting symptoms—often referred to as “chronic Lyme disease” or “Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome” (PTLDS). These cases are challenging both medically and legally, particularly when pursuing Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits.
When you are approved for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI), that approval is not necessarily permanent. SSA is putting increasing efforts into conducting Continuing Disability Reviews (CDRs) to determine whether you still meet the medical criteria for disability. Members of Congress – both Democrat and Republican – are encouraging SSA to conduct more reviews because the Social Security trust fund is running out of money and they see CDRs as a tool to keep the disability trust fund solvent, and to avoid making difficult political decisions about actually fixing the problem.