Call Today: 1-800-890-2262

Ginsberg Law Offices

Am I Getting the Right Amount of Money – Understanding Social Security’s Date Calculations

I received a question from one of my blog readers asking about date calculations.   I wish I could tell you that understanding Social Security’s date calculations and acronyms was easy but I can’ t say that.  I will try to offer some explanation about this confusing area.

i got an amended date signed by the judge but the  social ser, office only went back to 2005 when i had the hearing  and not the amended date that i was told they would go too. can you help me undersatnd this date stuff.
–Sandra

My reponse: Sandra, for sake of this blog post, I am going to talk mainly about SSDI benefits.  I’ll touch on SSI but I’ll make SSI date calculations the subject of a later post.

So that everyone is on the same page, when I speak about SSDI, I am talking about Title II disability – the kind of disability that you receive if you have worked and paid money into the system.  In order to qualify for SSDI, you have to be “insured” and have enough credits.  I am going to assume that Sandra has enough credits and that there is no issue regarding her eligibility for SSDI.

When you apply for SSDI, you will be asked about the “onset date” for your disability.  Since you are contending that you no longer have the capacity to work, I usually find that a good onset date is the day that you left your last full time job.   You can voluntarily change your onset date – sometimes I discover that my client chose a date that was many months after he was able to work and I amend the onset date to an earlier date.   In other cases, I find that my client used an onset date that was two or three years before she stopped working – in that case I might recommend that we amend the onset date forward as it is hard to argue that my client is disabled when she was still working full time. Continue reading →

Will I Win if the Judge Does Not Use a Vocational Witness or Medical Expert?

what are your chances of winning a case at a hearing when there is no voc rehab guy or medical specialist to assist the alj in a decision.
–Lamont

My response: Lamont, I think that yes you can win if the judge does not use a VE or an ME.   Here is how I would analyze:

First, what is the custom in your hearing office?  In Atlanta, where I practice, all but one or two judges regularly use vocational expert witnesses.  There are a couple of judges who almost never use them.   If a judge who always uses a VE hears a case without VE testimony, it most likely means that the issue is fairly clear cut one way or the other.

In the Atlanta hearing offices, judges rarely use medical experts – in my practice I would estimate that ME’s appear about 15% of the time.  The absence of an ME would be of less concern to me here in Atlanta. Continue reading →

Rheumatoid Arthritis Claimant Gets Denied – What Can She Do Next

I just got unfavorable decision for my SSI Disability and I can hardly walk or use my hands. I have RA and my doctor said I was permanently disabled. So why am I being denied?
– LaTrica

My response: LaTrica, firstly you should understand that there is an appeal you can filed to challenge the unfavorable decision.  In most jurisdictions, the appeal would be to the Appeals Council in Falls Church, Virginia.   In some limited jurisdictions the appeal would be directly to federal district court. Continue reading →

Jonathan Appointed to Faculty of Solo Practice University

Faculty @ SPU I am pleased to announce that I have been asked to join the faculty of an innovative and new online learning center called Solo Practice University.    Founded by Susan Cartier Liebel, a lawyer and editor of the Build a Solo Practice blog, SPU offers lawyers training about how to go into business – something definitely not taught in law school classrooms.

Solo Practice University™ is a revolutionary new web-based educational community that picks up where your legal education left off.

Learn from some of the most progressive lawyers, marketing pros, technology consultants and legal business giants how to:

* Plan, build and grow your private practice
* Differentiate yourself from the competition
* Attract and engage new clients more easily

… and much more. They just can’t teach you that in law school.

I will be teaching a class about how to set up and build a Social Security disability practice.   The doors to SPU will open on March 20, 2009 and when you enroll you will have access to practice building training in a variety of disciplines, including bankruptcy, commercial litigation, personal injury, malpractice, criminal defense, trusts and estates and more.  In addition, Susan has lined up several highly respected experts in essential practice development areas such as marketing, blogging and office technology.

If you are a new lawyer, or if you are a more seasoned lawyer contemplating starting your own practice, I can’t think of a better resource to shorten the learning curve than SPU.   Over the years I have taught continuing legal education courses about Social Security and most of the questions I get have to do with the practical side of lawyering – what books or computer programs should I get?  How do I get paid?  How do I spot good cases?  SPU goes a long way in filling this gap. Continue reading →

How Does the Judge Decide if You are Approved for SSI or SSDI

I regularly get questions from readers of my blog and web site about SSI, SSDI and the differences between the two.  The biggest difference:  you will be eligible for SSDI if you have worked and paid Social Security taxes into the system.  Generally to be fully insured, you need to have worked and paid taxes for 5 out of the last 10 years.

If you have worked consistently for 10 years then stopped working, therefore, you “insurability” will follow you for approximately 5 years.

One of the pieces of information I always look for is my client’s “date last insured” for SSDI.   If you have not worked regularly or if there is a big gap between dates that you worked, your date last insured could be an issue.  In order to recover SSDI, your onset date has to be earlier than your date last insured. Continue reading →

Sample On-the-Record Argument Available for Your Review

The first few weeks of 2009 have been extremely busy for me.  I have been appearing at 5 or more hearings just about every week this year.  I am trying to manage my caseload by submitting on-the-record requests in as many cases as I can.

My on-the-record request also serve as a pre-hearing brief for case that is on my calendar.  However, if I can convince the judge to approve my case without requiring me to drive or take the train downtown, my client can avoid the stress of appearing at a hearing and I can save myself several hours of time.

Recently I was schedule to try a case involving a 63 year old woman with documented back issues, diabetes and a neuromuscular disease similar to multiple sclerosis.  She was already receiving early retirement benefits, so the only issue was whether she was entitled to past due benefits from age 59, when she stopped working through age 62, when she began receiving early retirement benefits.

In my view this was a fairly clear cut case and there were several arguments to support our claim.  I set out my arguments in an on-the-record decision and emailed it to the judge, who I knew to be a fair and reasonable person.   A few days after I submitted my request I received an email back advising me that the judge was prepared to grant this claim.

The judge agreed to let me appear telephonically so on the morning of the hearing, the hearing assistant called me and we recorded a 5 minute hearing in which the judge announced his favorable bench decision.   Since I was at home that morning, I “appeared” by telephone while I was sitting in a comfortable chair in my t-shirt and gym shorts.

I redacted the personal information from the case, and published my on-the-record request on one of my Georgia Social Security disability web sites.   Click the link to read my argument.

How Do Job Training Programs Affect Continuing Disability Reviews

In my practice I do not see very many continuing disability review (CDR) cases.   If you are not familiar with this term, a “continuing disability review” involves a review by Social Security as to whether an approved claimant remains disabled.  For example, there are some medical conditions that can and do improve over time and with treatment.   I have been involved in many cases – especially those in which the claimant is in his 20’s or 30’s – when the judge specifically includes in his decision that a particular claimant should be reviewed in 1 year, or perhaps 3 years.

In theory, every Social Security disability case will be subject to a CDR.  In reality, because of the current backlog, I rarely hear from my clients that their cases are being reviewed.   The few cases that do seem to end up in a CDR typically involve younger claimants.

I am not usually called upon to handle CDR cases because Continue reading →

Can Claimant With Sporadic Work History Collect on Working Spouse’s Earnings Record?

I regularly get calls from potential clients who apply for Social Security disability, only to discover that they do not have enough credits to pursue a Title II SSDI claim.  In such cases, the only other option would be to pursue a Title XVI SSI claim.  However, SSI benefits are usually lower ($674 per month for an individual in 2009) and, more importantly, SSI payments are subject to offset if the claimant has a spouse who works.

I see this a lot among self employed people, or salespeople who are paid in cash and do not have money withheld for Social Security taxes.   Here is an email I received from the wife of such a claimant:

I have worked and paid into social security since 1965.  My husband worked on and off for the past 30 years, but has not regularly paid in to social security.  Ten years ago he was diagnosed with MS and he has been unable to work at all.  I went to Social Security to ask if I could get disability payments for him and they told me that I earned too much money ($45,000 annually).  I am now about to retire at age 60 and would like to collect disability for him.  I’ve gone through web searches and there is such a mire of information – I don’t know where to begin.  Can he collect against the money I’ve paid in?  He is completely dependent on me.

Jonathan’s response: unfortunately I think that you are out of luck. Continue reading →

Lack of Consistency Among Social Security Judges a Problem

“Do I have a good case?”  Inevitably I hear this question from every client I meet.  I hear it again during my pre-hearing conference and I hear it again immediately after the hearing.

If you have been waiting for disability benefits for 2+ years, you don’t care about statistics, about Social Security’s re-engineering, new Judges, processes to eliminate backlogs or anything other than whether you won.  And I would consider you perfectly reasonable to take this stance.

At the end of the day, however, I am not the one who makes the decision in your hearing.  My job is to identify the best argument supporting your claim for disability and to ask you the right questions to present that argument to the judge.  Beyond that, you can only hope that your judge is rational, reasonable and that he takes the time to listen to you. Continue reading →

Should Approved Claimant Report New Medical Problems to Social Security During Continuing Disability Review?

I don’t get a lot of questions about “continuing disability reviews” (CDR).  Here is one that raises an important issue.  For those not familiar with the term, a CDR is the process by which Social Security evaluates approved claimants to confirm that they still meet the requirements for disability under Social Security’s rules.

Sometimes, judges will specifically provide for a review in 12 months.  The official Social Security disability web sites provides that all cases are to be reviewed every 36 months (although it has been my observation that the 36 month reviews have been performed at random).  Although I have not seen any regulations to this effect, I suspect that the cases which are reviewed may be ones where improvement might be most likely.   For example, if your approval is based on a condition that could be corrected by (invasive) surgery, your case might be flagged for review.

You should also understand that disability attorneys like me rarely get involved in CDR cases.  Why?  Continue reading →

Top