One of the most common misunderstandings I hear from clients and visitors to my Wednesday evening livestreams has to do with the role of the Appeals Council. As you may know, if the hearing judge (called the Administrative Law Judge or ALJ) denies your disability claim, the next level of appeal is called the Appeals Council.
Many people assume the Appeals Council is simply a next step in the process—a second chance to tell their story and hope for a different result.
That is understandable, but it is not quite right.
The Appeals Council does not act like a second ALJ. It does not rehear the case, and it does not decide disability from scratch. Its job is much narrower and more technical. In most cases, it is not looking for a better answer. It is looking for a legal mistake.
Understanding that difference can mean the difference between a strong appeal and one that is almost certain to fail.
What the ALJ Does
To understand the Appeals Council, it helps to first understand the role of the Administrative Law Judge.
At the hearing level, the ALJ is the main decision-maker. The ALJ represents the Commissioner of the Social Security Adminstration and serves as both the representative of SSA and the finder of facts in your case. This is where the case is developed, reviewed, and decided. The ALJ listens to testimony, reviews medical records, weighs medical opinions, and decides what the claimant can still do despite their impairments. Continue reading →