Call Today: 1-800-890-2262

Ginsberg Law Offices

Tag Archives for multiple sclerosis and social security disability

Multiple Sclerosis Patient Seeks Strategy to Win SSDI Case Early

Here is a question I received from a multiple sclerosis patient who is preparing to apply for Social Security disability and is hoping to win her case early.

Jonathan,
First, I want to thank you for putting valuable information about the SSDI process online. I was diagnosed with MS in 1993. I recently left work on an early disability retirement after a 24 year career with the State of ABC.  My question is this – if I have MS and my medical records document cognitive dysfunction, isn’t it feasible that I would be approved with my initial application to SS? Although I did very well in the beginning of the journey, as I have gotten older, (I’m only 44), my disease has started progressing over the last few years. Will the fact that I have taken an early disability retirement from the state weigh favorably towards my case?

Here are my thoughts: the first question I would ask is “are you insured for Title II Social Security disability?”  In some states, employees do not contribute into the Social Security system- instead, they contribute to a state disability program.  For example, I sometimes get calls from teachers who may have worked for years, but who are not insured for Title II Cognitive dysfunction associated with multiple sclerosisdisability because their school system opted out of Social Security.  If you cannot tell from looking at an old paystub, I would advise you to contact your human resources office to confirm that you have been making payments into the Social Security system.    You can also call Social Security at 800-772-1213 to inquire as to whether you have been earning credits.  You can also request an earnings and benefit statement (Form 7004) from Social Security directly.

If you are not insured for Title II SSDI, then you might still be eligible for SSI, but that will depend on household income and the value of assets that you own.

Assuming you are eligible for Title II disability, your best chance at an early approval would be to request help from your treating doctor to show that you meet or equal the multiple sclerosis listing, which is found at  Listing 11.09.   When you read this listing, it does refer to cognitive issues by referring to Listing 12.02 which describes “organic mental disorders.”

I would print out the entire Multiple Sclerosis listing and the listings referenced in 11.09 and take the printout to your doctor’s office.  If your doctor or someone in his office is willing to write a narrative report describing your symptoms, course of treatment and state that your symptoms meet or equal what is contained in the listing, you greatly improve your chances at an early decision.  Your doctor should track the language of the listing as closely as possible, using the language of the listing wherever possible.   Further, since the disabling symptom you describe has to do with cognitive dysfunction, you may need to have a psychiatrist or a neuropsychologist evaluate you and write a narrative report that tracks Listing 12.02.

I take a similar approach when I am representing an MS client – although instead of a narrative report, I create a checklist for the doctor to complete and submit that to the Social Security judge along with copies of all medical records.  Often times, by the way, Social Security will provide the neuropsychological exam as a “consultative evaluation” that they pay for, however, if you can provide your own, you obviously  have more control of the process. Continue reading →

Q & A: Who is responsible for calling upon and compensating the Medical Expert witness?

Hello and welcome to the 4th installment of my Q & A series, which is designed to cover some of the more elusive topics associated with the Social Security Disability claims process. In this post, I answer a question asked about the Medical Expert witness (ME).

Question:

I have a disability hearing scheduled for next month in my Multiple Sclerosis disability case. As I have been unable to work for over a year, I have limited financial resources. I have read that an Administrative Law Judge often solicits the testimony of a medical expert on complex medical issues. Here are my questions: Who is responsible for assuring that the medical expert testifies at my Social Security disability hearing? And who compensates the medical expert? Is there any responsibility on my part?

My answer:

This is a great question and one I have not actually been asked. You are correct that Judges (ALJs) often seek the testimony of medical expert witnesses (MEs) in complex medical situations like yours.  Since ALJ’s have no direct communication with medical professionals and are not medicallyMedical Expert Witness trained, testimony from medical experts provide ALJ’s with a more complete and detailed understanding of your medical and/or mental situation prior to his/her issuance of an opinion in your matter.

Here’s how it works: Each hearing office maintains a roster of medical experts who routinely testify as expert witnesses in disability hearings. If you spend enough time at any one Social Security hearing office, then you will likely start to notice the familiar faces of some of these medical experts, many of which are retired doctors who have a wealth of medical knowledge that can be used to help the judge make a well-informed decision.

Since the ALJ is the individual that solicits the expert’s opinion, the SSA incurs the costs of paying the medical expert. So in answer to your question, you are not responsible for compensating the ME. It is all taken care of by the SSA.

Also, since you are pursuing a Multiple Sclerosis disability claim, I would like to tell you and any one else interested that I have been working on a website dedicated solely to the topic of Multiple Sclerosis and Social Security Disability. Because I have seen a lot of MS disability claims over the years, I figured I would  share some tips and knowledge on the subject. Please visit the site by clicking on the link, and be sure to let me know what you think!

Strategies for Winning Multiple Sclerosis Disability Claims

Over the past couple of months, I have taken a number of MS cases to hearings before different judges. So far, we are looking at favorable decisions in all of them. However, the evidence considered by the various judges has been anything but consistent.

I summarized the various case strategies that I use in multiple sclerosis cases on my Georgia Social Security Disability web site so I will not repeat that detailed summary here.  A couple of points that do jump out at me:

  • because MS is a disease that progresses through a series of flare-ups and remissions, it is not uncommon for my client to experience periods of functioning that could allow for minimally physically demanding work. I get past this issue by eliciting testimony from my client that stress from attempting to work (including preparing for work, traveling to work and performing work) can cause a remission period to shrink, and that my client’s functioning during a remission period is enhanced by staying in a comfortable, familiar home environment
  • ideally, an MS case file should contain doctor or ER visits in intervals of 3 months or less. However, if you cannot afford treatment or otherwise do not go to your doctor that often, a personal diary detailing symptoms can serve as viable evidence
  • judges recognize that MS is a degenerative condition that does not improve over time. There are a number of neuromuscular diseases related to MS that may comprise your diagnosis. It is important to have your doctor reference that your associated disease falls within the MS family

I also found that in each of the cases I tried, my clients came across as exceedingly credible – people that had long, consistent work histories and who clearly would prefer to land back in the work force. In many ways, your credibility as a claimant serves as the foundation for your case and the combination of believable testimony, a definitive diagnosis with known, serious symptoms and a solid work history makes for a disability case that will likely succeed.

Top